At a recent conference session on literature diversity in classrooms, I and also other attendees were encouraged to pass around a choice of books, study them, and discuss their feasible classroom use. A college librarian next to me picked up a copy of Sherman Alexie’s The for sure True Diary the a Part-Time Indian, and we started lamenting the scarcity the American Indian literature in classrooms. Then ns asked her if she knew Forrest Carter’s The education and learning of small Tree. Her smile tightened. “Oh, what a terrible book,” she replied. Her reaction did and also didn’t surprise me. The publication is a fixture in many schools, so i suspected she would acknowledge it. However, Little Tree’s more comprehensive history is still reasonably unknown, so i was enjoyment to accomplish someone who knew the truth about this faux-memoir. Based on her reaction, I suspect Little Tree holds no prominence in her library, despite it tho does in many classrooms.

You are watching: The education of little tree theme

A 2014 episode of This American Life explored perspectives toward Carter and also his book, consisting of interviews with high institution students that assisted contextualize its classroom impact. A student from Massachusetts, Joseph, make the sort of connection English teacher dream of:

was discovering to attend to racial discrimination and also prejudice and try and increase his knowledge of the world and nature. And I’m make the efforts to do that, too…. This is sort of embarrassing. But near the end, i really—I type of discovered myself gaining a small emotional. But I really preferred it. I discovered that ns really linked to tiny Tree. I felt favor he to be a lot prefer me. Kind of I’m top top the very same journey the he was. We’re both trying come become much better people. I’m trying to find out to be a an excellent person, come to be who ns am, be a man. But so was small Tree. (“180 Degrees”)

Who wouldn’t want to teach this book? and also how can Joseph be describing the very same novel the horrified the librarian? as is regularly the case, the teacher knew a bit an ext than the student. Specifically, she knew that Forrest Carter was originally Asa Carter, the writer of Alabama branch George Wallace’s infamous 1963 “Segregation Forever” speech. She knew the the writer who novel influenced Joseph to be a virulent racism in the 1960s. She knew that Little Tree began together a fraud, and negotiating an are for that in today’s classrooms is a troublesome task.

Because the Carter’s deceptions and also reprehensible past, Little Tree has garnered much an important disdain, however it is still a publication beloved by readers, consisting of many second teachers unaware the Carter’s past. Because that those educators who understand its history, two concerns are central: does the still merit research in English classrooms, and if it does, what need to that study look like? Continued vital engagement v the novel argues that the an initial answer is yes, that still rewards thoughtful study. Addressing the second concern requires careful pedagogical consideration, however starts through acknowledging that it can no longer be approached together Carter’s mystical autobiography. Instead, it must be scrutinized together a duplicitous message by a deceptive author. Such method fundamentally alters its great use, challenging students’ preconceptions and also impacting literature- and culture-based curricula. The also permits teachers come “unmask” both the book and also its writer in a managed environment, plumbing its educational value while exposing the injustices its author perpetrated. More generally, brand-new perspectives allow the dominant and sustained ignorance that the book’s true background to be exposed, transforming the classroom utility and including necessary considerations of society justice, both textually and also paratextually. Merely put, Little Tree offers more educational value now than it did prior to Carter’s previous was revealed, and also in the hand of a kind teacher, the can bring unique opportunities to the second English classroom.

A Brief history of Little Tree

Some additional context may be valuable for those unfamiliar through the book, that author, or that is history. The education and learning of tiny Tree by Forrest Carter was published with little fanfare in 1976, presented together the true story of the author’s upbringing in the Tennessee hills through his Cherokee grandparents, who served as guides toward a pan-tribal Indian spirituality emphasizing respect because that nature. Many critics uncovered it to be the perfect book for its time, providing the “primordial wisdom” (Browder 130) of American ind (real or imagined) the non-Indians had begun seeking as an alternative to west philosophies. Little Tree sat ~ above bookstore shelves throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, acquiring a little but faithful following, even as the author’s very first book, The Rebel Outlaw: Josey Wales, to be made right into a blockbuster west starring Clint Eastwood. It didn’t get in the American consciousness, however, until the university of new Mexico Press obtained the rights and also reissued it in 1986. This occasioned the book’s an initial serious crucial attention—a foreword through Cherokee legit scholar Rennard Strickland identify Little Tree as “one that those rare books like Huck Finn that each new generation needs to discover and which requirements to it is in read and reread regularly” (v) and noting that upon its early stage release, Little Tree was “universally acclaimed” (vi) and found audiences amongst young adults, librarians, an additional English teachers, and “students of native American life” that “discovered the publication to be as specific as it to be mystical and romantic” (vi). In 1991, it won the American Bookseller’s association ABBY award together the publication merchants most took pleasure in hand-selling (Reuter 104), and a modest place in the modern literary canon seemed assured.  

Then the bottom dropped out that the entirety enterprise. In 1991, twelve years after Forrest Carter’s death, Dan T. Carter (a feasible distant relative) composed to the New York Times identifying Forrest as Asa Carter, a “Ku Klux Klan terrorist, right-wing radio announcer, home-grown American fascist and also anti-Semite, rabble rousing demagogue” (A31). Though his company associates, admirers, and family resisted this information, by year’s end, Asa’s widow admitted the truth: Forrest to be Asa. He had not been raised by Cherokee grandparents, and he was responsible for racist speech and tasks during the Civil civil liberties era in the South. Immediately, the vital winds shifted. No longer was Little Tree “sold on the gift tables of Indian reservations” (Gates 15). Instead, college student vilified it together a produced deception, offering speculation the white supremacist agendas hidden in that is pages and eventually making use of it generally as a referent to framework discussions of newer literary pariahs such together James Frey. Little Tree’s loss from grace got to its nadir as soon as Oprah Winfrey removed it from she recommended publication list, explaining that, if the publication touched plenty of people, the revelations about Carter meant that she “had to take the publication off shelf” (“Oprah”).

The publication itself has actually not adjusted much in those forty years. Other than alterations to its cover art (removing the native “a true story”), the is the same text Freeman Owle said could assist readers know the Cherokee mental (Gates 15), the very same text The Atlantic championed through writing, “Some of that is sad, several of it is hilarious, some of it is unbelievable, and all of it is charming,” and also the exact same text of i m sorry the Chattanooga Times wrote, “If I could have but one publication this year this would be mine choice, because that it is a deeply felt work-related which satisfies and also fills” (Forrest Carter cover). Most importantly, the is the exact same text that proceeds to be teach to students choose Joseph in Massachusetts by teacher who are either unaware the its background or simply desperate for a publication that engages your students.

Shifting the central Appeal

My mentor at my existing institution has long asked prospective teacher to think about the “problems and also possibilities” of any teaching text. Ns have continued using this framework, and in Little Tree’s case, that is specifically suitable. The novel offers many teaching possibilities, yet they depend on reexamining that pedagogical implementation. In the past, teachers and also students valued its capacity to inspire students choose Joseph by to teach them something around the “Cherokee Way,” but this very nice one is now valid just to the degree that it deserve to be juxtaposed through the tough truths of its author.

Literary critics have discover this juxtaposition for decades. Daniel heather Justice write of his very first encounter v the book as a young Cherokee boy, reading it once and then automatically reading the again, illustration parallels between little Tree’s family and also his own. The “memorized favorite passages and took to imagining as little Tree” (20). Together an adult critic, however, Justice explains Little Tree as a “fanciful story based on stereotypes and also lies” (21). Viewing a message through the lens of its author’s fraud, especially when the fraud is revealed post-publication, complicates a reader’s relationship to any kind of work, and also exploring this complication helps students build the an essential faculties needed to command close textual analysis—a lot more rewarding task than just reading for enjoyment and inspiration. Due to the fact that of this, research studies of Little Tree can usefully shift to research the book’s controversies, and also in law so, press students’ critical faculties to new heights, specifically if they are also provided an essential writings about the message before and after Asa Carter’s unmasking. In fact, many an additional education standards push students towards such considerations at greater grade levels. The common Core requirements in reading for 11th/12thgraders asking students to “Delineate and also evaluate the dispute and certain claims in a text, consisting of the validity of the reasoning and the relevance and sufficiency the the evidence” (35), and the Indiana academic Standards appropriate to my own program call for them come “nalyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how come develop and relate elements of a story or drama” (Indiana n.p.). Engaging college student in the complicated work sorting reality from fiction in Little Tree helps deal with these standards and also prepare students because that the kind of close, intertextual analysis that is expected in college.

Such analysis leads to maybe the most exciting pedagogical “promise” of an unmasked Little Tree: the chance to discover the main mystery the Asa/Forrest Carter. That Asa to be a racist and also a practitioner of dislike speech in the 1960s is unquestionable, together is his check reinvention together Forrest, and much of Little Tree’s an important fate rests top top a revisionist analysis of the text based on such information. Shari M. Huhndorf writes that “the idyllic portrait Carter paints in The education of small Tree in many respects in reality complements the author’s earlier Klan politics” (132), and that through the pretense that Indian family members life in the Tennessee hills, Carter “attempts come vindicate the southern from the violent racial background and to redeem an clearly white supremacist view fallen into disrepute” (132). Her an initial point, the Carter sought come gloss over much of the racial background of the South, is beyond dispute, as is his fondness for an idealized antebellum South and also the rugged individualism he thought had to be suppressed by northern aggression—ideas plainly typified in the character of Granpa, whose distrust of politicians and also “big-city men” (Forrest Carter 123) echoes southern sentiments popular during Carter’s lifetime. However, Huhndorf’s crucial shift come her 2nd point—positioning Little Tree as a white superiorist text—is much less ironclad.

In her consideration of the book’s very first scene, in which little Tree and his grandparents plank a bus quickly after his parents’ death, Huhndorf writes that the ago of the bus, where the family members is required to sit, is “clearly a racialized an are recalling the problem over bus segregation and the succeeding boycott in the mid-1950s. In the novel, though, the ago of the bus is no an undesirable ar signifying that occupants’ oppression. Rather, it is a comfortable ar where little Tree find a feeling of love and belonging” (156). Walk Carter average to indicate there is nothing naturally wrong with their being required to the back of the bus, in order to minimizing the pain inflicted on tiny Tree and also his grandparents through white racists, or go Huhndorf misread the passage in support of her thesis? deserve to the scene in question additionally be regarded as a gently ironic passage the emphasizes tiny Tree’s innocence in contrast to the bus passengers’ tumultuous racism? The latter reading problems with lot of what us know about Carter, while Huhndorf’s reading is more at odds v the text itself. These space fascinating questions, and also though students may not know every nuance of Huhndorf’s argument, one astute teacher deserve to elicit their own vital responses by questioning whether they check out troublesome subtext in the scene, based on their symbolic knowledge of the back of the bus and close readings that both texts. Such discussion can likewise usefully affix to existing events and administer context for students to understand the horrifying rebirth of white supremacist beliefs in today’s political landscape.

Such passages likewise illustrate the an obstacle of considering Little Tree through the lens the Carter’s politics. Despite he never publically repudiated his racist beliefs, the concern of even if it is he carried such sentiments wholly unchanged into the “Forrest” period of his life is less quickly answered. Anecdotal proof exists of at the very least two instances after Carter suspect his brand-new persona when he used racial epithets in public and voiced racist principles (Rubin 79-80). In contrast, his editor at Delecorte Press, Eleanor Friede, responded to the revelation that Carter’s true identification by saying, “Oh, no. The couldn’t it is in the very same guy. He’s together a sweet, gentle, well man. That would never say a word around anybody since of the shade of your skin. And I recognize he’s not anti-Semitic, since my husband and I space Jewish, and we’ve had actually him come dinner a variety of times. And he’s constantly just together nice together he can be. It just couldn’t it is in the same man.” Additionally, chuck Weeth, a bookstore owner who operated with Carter during Little Tree’s initial publication, said, “I guess: v it’s sort of that feeling that give a man a chance, he might adjust himself. And we felt like, well, that tried to change himself and he thrived with us. Ns didn’t choose Asa Carter, I’ll insurance you. But I did prefer Forrest Carter” (“180 Degrees”). Clearly, something had changed around the man, but whether it to be sincere or performative is unknowable. Due to the fact that of this, questioning students about possible repentance or ideological change in Carter’s later life calls for them to cave deeply right into assigned texts, cultivating more complicated literary analysis.

Such analysis might also carry out teachers through an opportunity to connect a dispute that might seem distant and also minor to your students with an ext current and well-known events. In the past several years, the idea of cultural appropriation and also impersonation has uncovered its method into news headlines ~ above a continual basis, from the case of white former-NAACP activist Rachel Dolezal’s self-identification as an African-American woman to the current political headlines relating to senator and also 2020 presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s questioned family history of American Indian descent. While every of these cases (including Carter’s) need to be independently thought about in the classroom, facets of your discussion can usefully overlap. For example, go Elizabeth Warren’s clearly apology different her indigenous Carter’s absence of clean repentance? does Dolezal’s direct involvement with NAACP differentiate her indigenous Carter’s more nebulous usage of his suspect identity? such conversations not only promote deeper consideration of Little Tree, but also encourage the kinds of intertextual and multimedia explorations valued in virtually all state standards.

As Gina Caison writes in her terrific reconsideration that Little Tree, “The 3 most usual claims regarding Little Tree have been that it 1. Represents Carter’s atonement for his racialism past; 2. Hides a sinister stare of white dominance beneath a hopeful exterior the ‘Cherokee’ mythology; or 3. Produce such confident valuations of great morals that these inconsistent possibilities and the immorality that its author become irrelevant” (575). Asking students to advice these insurance claims in irradiate of anecdotal proof from Carter’s acquaintances and also comparisons the his subterfuge to other instances of social appropriation gets to the love of just how teachers have to be equipping castle to engage with literary texts, and illustrates probably the most educationally helpful “promise” Little Tree can make for today’s classroom.

The Caveat that Context

For teacher interested in making use of Little Tree to engage these to teach possibilities, it is additionally important to acknowledge its pedagogical problems and also the resulting advises teachers have to take in their classrooms. The most necessary of these caveats has currently been acknowledged: if Little Tree is taught, it can not be read as it was in the past, in spite of students’ herbal engagement through its surface ar appeal. Complete context should be provided and processed. Due to the fact that of this, it appears unlikely that the book can be effectively taught in middle schools, wherein students are less intellectually equipped to interact in together weighty vital considerations, and also its usage is more than likely most ideal in high college courses designed for progressed students. The novel’s rewards room worth pursuing, yet only by mature and also inquisitive readers oversaw by pedagogically sophisticated teachers. The prose continues to be appealing, yet this allure need to be treated not as an end, yet rather as a way for deeper textual exploration. In capable hands, the book’s earnest simplicity is great conduit because that subtextual and also paratextual considerations of the novel, whereas works v denser prose regularly complicate such analysis for students. In other words, because Little Tree is basic read, students can far better scrutinize subsequent challenges to their initial perceptions.

If educators have to not i have dissolved Little Tree, however should also guard against its misinterpretation and oversimplification, what teaching methods properly thread this needle in the classroom? since of Carter’s political backstory, Little Tree cannot exist in a vacuum, and also its teaching need to be accompanied by second readings such together Justice’s, Huhndorf’s, and also Caison’s, and also the extr pedagogical and also moral inquiries their inclusion elicits. Is it an ext effective, for example, to let the students endure Little Tree as Carter intended and then face them with criticisms (thereby forcing lock to an obstacle their early assumptions), or is it an ext useful to carry out all information up front for an educated initial reading? any kind of teacher using Little Tree in the classroom should have actually pedagogically sound answers to together questions.

Michael marker articulates an additional caveat as soon as he suggests that Little Tree should it is in avoided due to the fact that of its dependence on American Indian stereotypes (226). If his caution is warranted, it presupposes viewing the publication explicitly as American Indian literature, which is clearly no longer acceptable. However, Little Tree can carry out effective thing lessons if coupled v legitimate Indian works by authors such together Alexie, Leslie Marmon Silko, or Louise Erdrich, as well as many of the primary Indian texts included in literature textbooks. Such works not only expose student to legitimate American Indian writers, but can likewise facilitate comparisons between Indian self-identification and non-Indian consciousness of Indian life. For example, how could students check out the share “Cherokee Way” that Little Tree against the details tribal beliefs explored in plenty of of Erdrich’s stories? together lessons foster an important analysis and deal with standards together as typical Core reading Standard 9: “Analyze exactly how two or much more texts address comparable themes or subject in bespeak to develop knowledge or to compare the philosophies the writer take” (35). As mentioned before, depictions of American Indian society are too regularly either lacking in English classrooms or viewed reductively. Pass Little Tree into conversation with legitimate Indian literature can carry out useful perspectives top top how and also why the happens.

Such intertextual contact introduces one more caveat: while Little Tree can it is in taught together a standalone text, it is many pedagogically beneficial in multitextual units. Whether offered as a comparative device in American Indian literary works lessons or interdisciplinary systems on the Civil rights movement, the can administer unique counterpoints to various other writings. Caison explores this interdisciplinarity by reframing Little Tree primarily as a southerly novel, explaining the “The text’s coupling of a Confederate Lost reason ideology more connects the to bigger trends in southern literature, together does that appeal come an affective link of Southern identity that is highly invested in a quasi-mystical attachments to the land” (574). Imagine a Southern literary works unit that assigns Little Tree alongside functions by wilhelm Faulkner and also Flannery O’Connor, illuminating perspectives on Carter’s writing and also persona the are regularly downplayed when the book is approached together American Indian literature.

A final, critical caveat: teaching a text as contentious Little Tree requires a good deal the foresight and also preparation by the teacher. Knowledge the nuances the the text and its writer is important, but making them clean to college student is crucial. It would be unwise for teachers to bring the novel right into their classrooms without very first consulting administrators and contacting parents to make their intentions clear and providing the vital context because that a effective unit of study, and also those interested in guidance on initiating together actions are urged to consult the national Council of teacher of English place statement, “The Students’ right to Read.”

Even much more critically, teacher who select to study Little Tree in their classrooms should explore resources and also engagement opportunities detailed by American Indian tribes, organizations, and scholars. Non-Indian teachers, however well-intentioned, should avoid the temptation to speak in one uninformed or underinformed way about, or on instead of of, lack members generally and those in the Cherokee nation specifically. Most energetic tribes, including the Cherokee, sell educational literature and also outreach programs with their websites and also governmental offices, and a number of American Indian scholars, consisting of several listed in the functions Cited web page of this essay, have written generally on the topic of Indian depiction in culture, literature, and also classrooms. No educator should undertake the formidable job of to teach Little Treewithout very first utilizing such resources.

Little Tree as Teachable Moment

Given these cautions, any kind of discussion the Asa Carter and also Little Tree in the 21st century great begs a main question: why teach this troublesome publication at all as soon as there are so many better ones? there are more answers come the question than this write-up provides, however two seem specifically relevant. First, Little Tree is already included in countless classrooms, where it is regularly taught v ignorance of its author. While that is feasible to simply ask teachers to remove the book from their classrooms, together a request runs contrary to the aforementioned NCTE missive, which says that “n selecting publications for reading by young people, English teachers take into consideration the donation which each work may make come the education of the reader, that is aesthetic value, its honesty, that readability because that a certain group of students, and its appeal come adolescents. English teachers, however, may use different works for different purposes” (National Council; focus added). If such liberty is leavened through an earnest feeling of responsible purpose, adjusting how the book is taught offers an ext benefit than merely decreeing that it shouldn’t be taught. This approach will more profoundly transform the book’s usage over time, both revealing the full fact of Carter and also his novel in a structured environment and also educating student on crucial historical and modern issues in social justice. A corollary come these approaches is that, when approached thoughtfully, Little Tree provides distinct teaching opportunities that are challenging to discover elsewhere, help students interact a comprehensible text in facility literary and cultural analysis.

Ultimately, secondary teachers should check out ways come reshape their usage of Little Tree, bright a light on the blemishes, controversies, and authorial shame while likewise asking difficult questions about its content and themes. That rewards mindful study in means it could not have when published forty years ago, and also it need to be both criticized thoroughly and recognized as the occupational of a talented and also immensely flawed writer. In necessary ways, and especially in second classrooms, Little Tree faintly echoes Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice: both space the product of gifted yet intolerant writers, giving substance, thoughtfulness, and also deception. Just as the anti-Semitism that Shakespeare’s beat forever bars that from being stated in the exact same breath together Hamlet or Macbeth, therefore Little Tree can never ever be the classic critics when suggested. Its natural contradictions and also puzzles, however, together its engaging, lucid prose provide useful and unique pedagogical devices for English teachers. Together Caison writes, “we need to take the worst components of our background out the the basement. Not due to the fact that we desire to celebrate them, but due to the fact that we want to relocate forward—honestly and also legitimately” (593). Few books provide this opportunity as totally as The education and learning of small Tree.

Works Cited

“180 Degrees.” This American Life. National Public Radio, WBEZ, Chicago, 13 Jun. 2014.

Browder, Laura. Slippery Characters: country Impersonators and American Identities. U of phibìc Carolina P, 2000.

Caison, Gina. “Claiming the Unclaimable: Forrest Carter, The education and learning of tiny Tree, and also Land claim in the aboriginal South.” The Mississippi Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 3/4, 2011, pp. 573–95.

Carter, Dan T. “The revolution of a Klansman.” New York Times, 4 October 1991, p. A31.

Carter, Forrest. The education of small Tree. U of new Mexico P, 1991.

Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. “‘Authenticity,’ or the class of tiny Tree.” New York times Book Review, 24 November 1991, p. 26.

Huhndorf, Shari M. Going Native: ind in the American cultural Imagination. Cornell UP, 2001.

Indiana department of Education. Indiana scholastic Standards. Authors, 2014.

Justice, Daniel Heath. “A Lingering Miseducation: Confronting the legacy of Little Tree.”Studies in American Indian Literature, vol. 12, no. 1, 2000, pp. 20-36.

Marker, Michael. “The education and learning of tiny Tree: What It yes, really Reveals about the Public Schools.” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 74, no. 3, 1992, p. 226.

National council of teachers of English. “A Students’ right to Read.” 1981, http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/righttoreadguideline. Accessed 30 June 2017.

National Governors Association facility for ideal Practices & council of chief State school Officers. Common core State criter for English Language art & literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.Authors, 2010.

Reuter, M. “‘Education of little Tree’ Wins Booksellers’ an initial ABBY Award.” Publisher’s Weekly, 10 march 1991, p. 2.

Rubin, Dana. “The Real education and learning of little Tree.” Texas Monthly, February 1992, pp. 78+.

See more:
What Does It Mean When A Man Calls You Hun ', Does It Mean He Finds

Strickland, Rennard. Foreword. The education of small Tree, by Forrest Carter, U of new Mexico P, 1991, pp. V-vi.